Week One Assignment – Part
1- Reflection
I
really enjoyed learning about the history of school funding. It really helps
put our current situation into perspective and it is evident that the problem
of school finance has plagued our forefathers. As I read the historical issues I was reminded of how
wonderful it is to be an American and more specifically a Texan. By learning the history of these reforms
I am given a helpful perspective in viewing our current budget. As a future superintendent it will be
helpful to take this with me.
The
assignment itself was not the issue, but the technology and how to achieve
collaboration was seemingly unclear.
I have found that not just the members of my group were confused but
that other members in the cohort were having difficulty as well.
Week
One Assignment – Part 2 – Reflection
My
group had basic understanding of funding formulas. I felt that I needed more information than just the lecture
and could not find any of the suggested readings. So I did the next best things and googled it. I found an excellent PDF out by TEA last January that honestly
goes into more depth than some of the documents in epic. I posted this to our discussion board
and while it is 50 pages long, it leaves no topic uncovered for Texas School
Finance. I learned A LOT from this
assignment. This was the area
where I wanted to learn and understand more. All of the allotments, the Tiers, and the formulas for WADA
were very helpful!
Week
One Assignment – Part 3 – Reflection
I
realized how perspective becomes such a viable definition for every educator
and lawmakers understanding of these concepts. I have read the laws and read the new cases that are being
currently discussed on Texas ISD and find this to hold true for each individual
from corporations, to boards of trustees, to parents, to lawmakers, to
teachers, and to school administrators.
Many people hate Robin Hood because it takes way funds from already
wealthy districts and helps equitably provide adequate funding for the
receiving district. The wealthy
district remains unharmed and is still able to provide (according to the state)
an adequate education. Special
education and bilingual education is always a discussion with equity and even
with equality. Some sides feel
that the amount of money that is spent of these students should be reduced to
support more of majority of the students.
If you were to ask a parent of a Special Ed or Bilingual student I am
sure you would get a much different opinion.
Week
One Assignment – Part 4 – District Comparison
As
I began to review my district improvement plan I found that it looked very
similar to the year before and then even the year before that. This week I attended a workshop on
Comprehensive Needs Assessment and I am going to take over our District
Improvement Plan. This was the largest
difference between my DIP and Austin ISD was that when there was goal set then
funding and personnel was devoted to this goal. Each goal for Austin ISD was
marked by how they were going to monitor the results of the plan in place. Key funding sources for many of the
initiatives comes from the Compensatory Allotment, Grants, and Title 1 federal
funds. My district does not have
anyone that is dedicated to grant writing and I feel like this should be something
that the administrative team should look in to. All of our compensatory and Title
1 funds are currently being for salaries after all of the budget cuts. I am sure that Austin ISD’s current Dip
would reflect this also. In our DIP we did state the implementation of
campus-wide PBS systems, but there was no money or personnel devoted to
this. In Austin ISD they were
hiring PBS coordinators and people to help track this data. Their implementation process was very
in depth and required specifics steps for everyone in the district to easily
follow. There are some areas in
our district where I know that we need to focus improvement efforts on and Austin
ISD left no stone unturned. They
addressed everything from graduation rates to attendance to discipline referrals. In my district it is tough to see what
we need to focus on looking from the outside because the dates on the DIP were
just changed and we never did a formal comprehensive needs assessment. Four years ago we hired an outside
agency to come in and put together our CIPs and DIPs and now we just change the
dates. I pulled up other districts DIPs on their web sites if they were posted
and noticed that some look pretty cookies cutter while others are a livable
document used for truly working towards improvement. While I did find other DIPs that I liked better format wise
than Austin ISD, I found that theirs really included a lot of meeting minutes
and communication with stakeholders.
I worked in Austin ISD for 3 years and know that each site based decision-making
team meets once a month, which is more than the bi-annual requirements that the
state mandates. This is reflected
in the DIP and I think that this would benefit our district to engage in more
meetings like these to get a true feel for what changes need to be made district-wide.
No comments:
Post a Comment